I received a complaint from a reader a while ago that this blog is far too negative about what I call 'Headmind'.
My reader reminds me:
"Without Headmind there would be no language and no communication between human beings. And without those basic cognitive abilities there would be no social rules, no laws and, therefore, no community. Indeed, we would not be able to share experiences and empathise with others and we would not be able to have any kind of relationship with our fellow creatures.
Without Consciousness we would not be capable of reflecting on experience and to make inferences, deductions, generalisations and theories - meaning, in turn, that we would be completely unable to learn anything new whatever.
Although Headmind (as you say) can be stupid, irrational and destructive it is also responsible for tremendous creative discoveries, such as those in mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, architecture, transportation, engineering and information technology. Without the intellect there could be no science, philosophy, no art, no literature, no music and no innovation of any kind. Nor, of course, would you have been able to write any of your books or your blog."
Point taken, and it therefore seems appropriate to start up a new series on how to think properly.
First up is that you don’t need to have a high IQ, or a degree, to be an effective thinker. I have met people blessed with what they tell me are 'high IQs' who are complete failures in life. Come to think of it, people who believe that IQ tests actually mean anything could be on a dumb track themselves. I write as someone whose own IQ has been scored at 138 but believes that to be a handicap rather than an advantage.
I have spent 11 years researching and lecturing at colleges and universities and many of the academics I have met have been amongst the most fucked-up people I know. They can be slaves to books; write (or talk) in incomprehensible jargon; remote from everyday life; lack common-sense; and have all the social skills of a failed rapist. And some of these have damnable mental health issues: one quite well known professor of psychology known to me has a serious social phobia, which forces him to run like hell as soon as his lectures finish, in case he actually has to talk to anyone. Another case - this one a senior lecturer in philosophy - is unable to operate a washing machine, change a bed, or boil an egg (although it could be that he is just very skilled at manipulating his women to do what he is too lazy to do himself).
I have also met people who, like me, left school at 15 and who are sassy, street-wise, and successful. Who are 'clever' in terms of exercising wit, getting along with people, thinking clearly, making decisions, solving problems and achieving their goals. They also tend not to be bores, unlike many people who think of themselves as intellectually superior.
In my next post I will start detailing some ground rules for thinking effectively.

