Last week, my article arguing that schools ought to provide lessons in emotional intelligence was published in a new book: Shaping a New Educational Landscape, now available from Amazon.
The book has stimulating articles by well-known educationalists, teachers, consultants and government advisors - and me. I urge those of you who can afford it to buy it anyway as it is all in a good cause. We writers are donating all our royalties to the building of a new school in Juba in the Sudan.
The point of my article is that children who aren't taught emotional intelligence aren't likely to make good students. Instead they may be handicapped by low-self-esteem, difficulty in getting along with others, stress, problems in handling setbacks (i.e. giving up too easily), and communicational problems. They will also be battling with rage, and unresolved emotions such as anger, frustration and fear. Which, in turn, leads to disruptive behavior, defiance, exclusion, expulsion and academic failure. Even if the child is an academic success, failures in emotional intelligence can lead later on to a deadening Headmind approach to life. People who score high on IQ (meaning they know how to do quizzes) but low on emotional intelligence may lack warmth, common-sense, empathy, and the ability to relate to ordinary people (a problem I notice, that is widespread amongst medical doctors, academics and lawyers).
I am passionate about this issue because every week, in Reverse Therapy, I work with children and adolescents who are suffering from Chronic Fatigue syndrome, ME, and anxiety problems simply because they have never been taught how to work with their emotions.
Do you agree with me that teaching emotional intelligence to choldren in schools ought to be a priority?
Below are the opening few paragraphs in my article, as published in the book, so that you can get the flavour. Please contribute.
Rousseau revisited: formal and personal learning
‘It takes a village to raise a
child.’
African Proverb
Introduction
In this article I want to argue that if formal education is not complemented by methods that elicit social and emotional intelligence from the child then a variety of problems will result that may mean that formal education never gets started. And should it get started it may never be completed if the child does not know how to make use of the ‘learning’ she has been offered. And that even if it is ‘finished’ it may make little difference to her quality of life.
To take my own case: I possess a PhD in Psychology, a Masters in Psychotherapy and a BA in Philosophy. I have lectured in these matters at every grade from A level, through to professional seminars and up to University Undergraduate level. An educational success? Perhaps so. And yet I left school at 15.
After a long period of poor behaviour, indiscipline and dire exam grades at the Grammar school I attended in the UK during the 1970s, my teachers made it clear to me that there was little point in my continuing. That if I did I would very soon be expelled. My working class father was delighted. He saw formal education as a pointless diversion from the real business of learning a trade and making money. So he found me an apprenticeship and it was another 4 (wasted) years before I found the courage to go back into education on another footing.
Although the potential for academic
achievement at the Grammar school was present, in my case it was vitiated by
immaturity in social relations and self-management; a defect that may have been
remediable.
My key difficulty was that I was often overcome by inchoate states of frustration, despondency and rage. These states were hard for me to name, let alone identify. They typically came up after I had been bullied, or punished for what I saw as minor offences, or ridiculed by a teacher, or sitting through lessons in subjects for which I had little interest.
Looking back, I can see clearly that my bad behaviour was promoted by rebelliousness, attention-seeking and revenge. Naturally these responses merely compounded the problem and set the scene for more interactional problems. Another key problem was that the school: its rules, its ethos, and its teaching style seemed both alien and nonsensical to me. Partly this was due to my being one of the very few working-class children at the school. But, more profoundly, I lacked an enlightened tutor – or mentor – who could ‘interpret’ for me. I really needed to be taught how to work the system, as well as recognize both the sources for, and the solution to, my own despair......




