Reverse Thinking

Can feeling grumpy be good for you?

I receive a mischievous communication from my very good friend Mark McGuinness who wants me to comment on a research article he has looked into, written by some 'Australian psychologists', which claims that being in a 'bad mood' can be 'good' for you.

Now, some of my best experiences in life have been prompted by my 'bad' moods. With the aid of those I have got rid of countless annoying relationships, irritating jobs and pointless activities. So my first thought was that - yet again - a bunch of overpaid academics were being subsidised to announce discoveries most of us learned in primary school. And that Mark had forgotten our many rambling midnight conversations about emotions and the meaning of life.

Yet I realised immediately that these gorgeous, Bondi-beach seeking academics have made yet another category mistake: While bad moods can, indeed, be 'good', those are not the same as 'bad emotions'.

To remind you: there is no such thing as a bad emotion. Emotions are an expression of Bodymind
intelligence. A mood is different. It is a  Headmind attitude. It expresses a relationship between our attitudes and the world as we find it. You can read more about moods here.

A grumpy mood, for me, is a relationship based on suspicion. It means that I no longer trust that experiences, situations, people, or the Lord God himself are doing me any favours. And that, in turn, is a cue that I need to revise my trusting attitude towards these entities. I need to retreat, stand-off, complain, and have a moan. I may even need to disengage - permanently.

So yes - a grumpy mood can be good for you if it helps you get rid of your intellectual garbage.

The funny thing is that I actually find grumpy moods enjoyable. Entraining my suspicion and pessimism on the planet gives me a god-like sense of detachment and playfulness. It also gives me a playground for wit.

Rather like one of my favourite philosophers - Arthur Schopenhauer - who once wrote:

"If we were not all so interested in ourselves, life would be so uninteresting that none of us would be able to endure it."

Come to think of it, Schopenhauer deserves an article all to himself, so I will write that next.

The secret of making great movies II

I received a great response to my last article - The secret of making great movies - with many of you recommending movies and sharing experiences. Thanks to all of you who wrote in.

This response is from my friend Stephan Langguth who is also a German film director, as well as a practitioner of Reverse Therapy. If offers a professional viewpoint as well as making some great observations about emotions and film-making.

Film making can appeal to Headmind as it imagines that there is a place it can control others. "I project my ideas onto the big screen and everyone in the audience will cry. And I sit in the little projection booth laughing." That's the Ego fantasy.

Then one begins to realize that nothing involves viewers unless there is some truly alive thing in everything that happens on set while the camera is recording.

Although the storyboard needs to make some sort of sense in order to maintain the viewer's interest, Headmind does not really enjoy powerful, gripping, intense experiences because then its own importance gets diminished. People forget who they are if they are engrossed in a movie and that means they forget their own cherished obsessions and bananas. So Headmind really wants to put an end to cinematic experiences as soon as possible.

Headmind will often try to reassert its dominance after the movie is over. It does this with unfair comparisons ("not as good as this or that"), nit-picking details ("the director could have done that better") or dismissing emotion ("that 'sentimental' scene spoilt it for me").

So what makes a movie move us?

All the aspects you mention in your first article move the audience only if they are felt in Bodymind by the film-makers while they are making the film. That includes writers, directors and actors as well as the camera operators, film editors and sound producers.

For example, a red interior sometimes feels right yet at other times feels wrong. A close-up sometimes works and sometimes does not work. Gifted film-makers use Bodymind to lead them through the very subtle decisions necessary. These decisions are far too complex for Headmind to make.

One of the most important factors in a great movie is to have actors who stop 'acting' and instead express the character from within. That is because one major part of the cinematic experience is the empathy the audience feels as the mirror neurons in the brain pick up the emotional state of the character.

If the actor is in a false state, just acting out what they assume the character should look like, then the movie will become lifeless, cliched, 'hammy'.

Headmind focused directors like to think they can control the audience with false performances. They end up doing daytime TV ads! I've been on such shoots. If the director talks to the actors at all it mostly consists of a repetitive command like "Look happy, happy happy..." or "act confused now...".

In contrast if the actor forgets herself in favor of being (the character), a great and deeply involving performance becomes possible. This "being" is nothing else than fully connecting to Bodymind. And once the actor is in Bodymind viewers connect to their own Bodymind (an additional benefit for this is that they can spend the next couple of hours without being pestered by their internal control freak).

Makes me feel like getting my camera out again...

Stephan Langguth

The secret of making great movies

My good friend James Carter (who is himself an up-and-coming feature film editor), has been studying Reverse Therapy and tells me that he has identified an important fact about classic movies. And that is that they work on two different levels - the intellectual (or Headmind) level and the emotional/ sensory (Bodymind) level.

He cites Blade Runner as a great movie that many viewers did not understand when it first came out (it bombed at the box office), partly because the plot is complex but, more importantly because each shot seeks to evoke an emotion in us. For that reason the narrative can be hard to follow. Yet it is a film of great, strange, tragic, power. Who can forget the scene in which the android, Rachel, bursts into tears when she discovers that she is in fact a robot and that her memories of a happy childhood are implants. Or the near final scene (above) in which the android played by Rutger Hauer says goodbye to life:

"I've...seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain...Time to die."

James tells me that talented film-makers use a variety of means to convey emotion:

• Close-up shots of the Actors
• The intonation of words
• Landscape and scenery
• Music
• Lighting, shade, color

Looking through lists of 100 best movies it is hard to disagree with James' conclusions. To take some random examples:

• Casablanca. Bogart sitting alone after midnight in his night club mourning over what might have been with Ingrid Bergman and telling Sam to play 'As Time Goes By' again.
• Godfather II. The close up of Michael Corleone's face when he realises that his own brother tried to have him killed. In the background are the still waters of Lake Tahoe.
• On the Waterfront. Marlon Brando's battered face as they ride through a bleak Brooklyn landscape and he tells his corrupt brother that he too 'could have been a contender'. The film is shot in a grainy black-white-and grey.

Interestingly, it seems that a movie can be great even if it only seems to works on the emotional level. Quite a few Spielberg movies fall into this category (example: E.T. The Extra Terrestrial), as does Blade Runner itself. But its hard to think of a great movie that only works on an intellectual level (ultra-boring art-house movies fit here).

What do you think?

Do you have a favorite movie that works on both levels?

Can you name a scene from that movie that does just that?

Why releasing anger is better than controlling it

The myth about anger

A while ago the BBC carried an item about the effects of anger on health.

The argument runs that people who control their anger rather than expressing it are healthier.

This is a common myth and I want to explain why it is wrong. And why expressing your anger is actually better for you in the long run, provided you do it in the right way.

Bodymind creates anger for a purpose

The human body is designed to produce anger and it uses a very sophisticated circuitry to do that - running from the thalamus, through the amygdala and then on through the adrenal glands and the sympathetic nervous system. So we know anger must have an important purpose. Dismissing an emotion like that as harmful or 'bad for your health' is just disrespectful.

The purpose of anger is to ensure that you are treated with respect, protected against exploitation, have your wishes taken seriously, or to cue you towards self-defence.

Your righteous anger

Without anger we would be defenceless against attacks on ourselves or the people we love, against exploitation, cruelty and injustice. What keeps Aung San Suu Kyi fighting against the military in Burma? Her desire to keep her father's dreams for Burma alive are important, to be sure. But I suspect that her passion is what keeps her going when others would just give up.

Even Christ was furious when he noticed the wide boys outside the Temple degrading the holy places. All prophets, all heroes, all crusaders against injustice (think Martin Luther King) have possessed that righteous anger. But they also knew how to channel it in the right direction.

Misusing anger

In Reverse Therapy I notice that people who don't do anger well make three common mistakes:

1. They bottle up anger and later on, once the pot is filled to boiling point, they explode in uncontrollable rage (which creates stress and damages your health)
2. They express anger but don't follow up and ensure that they get what they need (for example, you yell at your daughter for not keeping her room tidy but you don't enforce the rule - so it happens all over again).
3. When they express anger they shout, swear, call names, blame, scream and try to make the other person feel as bad as possible.

The reason for these mistakes is simply lack of education in emotional intelligence. We are told as children that anger is 'bad', 'destructive', 'self-indulgent', etc. So we aren't given permission to explore the emotion in more depth. At the same time we watch the adults around us having tantrums and so we conclude that anger must, indeed, be an evil thing.

Anger is a hot emotion

Anger is a 'hot' emotion. Meaning that most people feel it very powerfully in Bodymind, rising up and demanding fast expression. But that doesn't mean your body wants you to go into a rage. What it means instead is that your body is warning you that something deeply important to you or the people you love is at stake and you need to speak up quickly.

Releasing anger

You can use the Reverse Assertiveness process to channel your anger into words that get people listening to you and ensure that you actually get what you want. Instead of just blowing off.

Just as important as using a formula like this is to practice expressing your disatisfaction every day. No matter how trivial your complaint is, make your likes and dislikes known. If you get them out at an early stage then they you can stay calm and you won't get angry. Nor will you explode in rage. Or get stressed. Or unwell.

One more point. Anger can be divine. Especially when you speak up for the defenceless, the innocent, for those who live in hunger, terror, torture and exile.

If you agree with me that Aung San Suu Kyi's cause is just then please sign the petition calling for her release here.

        "It is wise to direct your anger towards problems - not people. To focus your energies on answers - not excuses."

        W. A. Ward.

The Emotoscope

The Emotoscope is a really neat test on your moods that you can take right now.

It was developed by Josh, who also runs a stimulating blog on emotional intelligence - 6seconds. Full credit to him.

It works by matching your choices from different types of facial expression, to your likely emotional state in the present moment.

The Emotoscope tells me that Bodymind must be creating cellular memories in the Limbic system in order to 'scan' human facial expressions and match them to your own emotions.

Readers may recall that emotions are guides to action that tell you what to do next when you notice a change in the behavior of people around you (e.g., love them a little more, fight them, or walk away).

That mechanism could also work in reverse by tracking back your current emotional state to the faces linked with it.

The more we understand about the relationship between facial recognition, the brain and the emotions, then the more Emotionally Intelligent we are going to become.

Image by MegElizabeth_

12 steps to emotional depth

This says it all really....and it's a neat adaptation of the 12 Steps of Alcoholic's Anonymous to the development of Emotional Health.

Just click on the image to make the text larger.

Image by pshutterbug

Emotional intelligence

This is the latest in the series about Effective Thinking Skills. This time around I want to talk about the right way to think about emotions. To do that we need to understand:

                Image by By Anders Ljungberg.

1. What emotions are and what they are for

2. The difference between emotions and mind-states

3. Why awareness is vital

4. When we can expect to experience emotions

5. When it is ok not to have emotions

6. The best way to speak up about emotions

This post discusses your answers to questions 2, 4, 8, 12, 14 and 22 in The Effective Thinking Skills Test.
                                                                           

1. What emotions are for

I have already written about this in last month's blog - What Emotions Can Do For You. Briefly, an emotion is a Bodymind comment on the situation we are in. It tells us what sort of situation it is (e.g. threatening, confusing, rewarding, etc). Emotions also predict what will happen if we don't take action and guide us towards the correct actions to take (e.g. connecting to other people, asserting one's rights, fixing problems, having fun, etc.).

2. The difference between emotions and mind-states

States like anxiety, depression and resentment - and relaxed, calm or serene moods - are not emotions. They are states of mind. For example, anxiety builds up as Headmind indulges in worry, depressing emotions and blocking action.  The sensations of agitation and panic arise because the body is reacting to negative thinking by pressing 'the alarm button' on the sympathetic nervous system. Bodymind urgently needs us to spring into action on the problem (which includes talking to people) but poor thinking skills mean we go over the problem again and again, rather than switching attention to the likely solutions.

The core problem is that in negative states like these, Headmind is not exercising awareness. It is not grounded in the now, in the present moment, or focusing what emotions are telling us about the right thing to do.

3. Why Awareness is important

Positive states such as Mindfulness occur when we bring our attention back to the present moment, reconnecting to the body, owning our emotions, and exercising spontaneity. We do this just by exercising awareness. We can achieve that through meditation, yoga, breathing techniques, Tai Chi, Qi Gung and in numerous other ways. In Reverse Therapy we most often use sensate focusing and breathing techniques as tools.

Practicing these techniques filters out the Headmind yada-yada-yada that pollutes awareness. And doing that enables us to move with the flow of experience as circumstances change, and our feelings dictate. There is some excellent, practical, advice on how to improve mind-states and develop Awareness on the Simple Dollar blog.

4. When we can expect to have emotions

With two exceptions, an emotional release is triggered whenever an unexpected change takes place. For example, your child is late home, your partner betrays you, or you lose someone close to you. Your body triggers fear, anger and sadness respectively. The two exceptions are boredom and frustration. Those two emotions tell you have been stuck in the same monotonous situation for too long and its time to go and do something more rewarding.

Now life is so arranged that we will frequently get sad. We lose friends, parents, grandparents and, sometimes, our children. We leave our jobs, our homes, and our partners. And when we get very sad we cry. Now some studies have shown that tears are essential for health. They wash away toxins produced by stress and they also release the hormone, prolactin, which has a calming effect.

So there is something wrong with people who never cry. My observations of clients who tell me this is that they have been conditioned into believing that tears are 'unmanly', 'self-indulgent', or 'childish'. They just don't have permission to be sad and they are unable to use effective thinking skills to resolve it.

5. It's ok not to have emotions when we don't actually have any

Bodymind creates emotions like fear, anger and sadness when it wants to alert you to an unexpected change, help you understand the situation you are in, motivate you to do something, and guide you towards the appropriate action.  When your body doesn't have any concerns about you then you won't have  any emotions.

Now, the most common myth about grief in that it is a process we have to go through. And that it takes a long time and that we have to do it in stages. This is just not true.

Sadness is not the same as grief. The first one is an emotion, the second one is a state of mind. When we go through a bereavement Bodymind will trigger sadness so that we know we need to take time out for ourselves and adjust to our loss, talk about what we are going through, honor the memory of the person who had passed on, and (most importantly) bond closer to our friends, partners and families, so that they can give us the support we need. The reason we have funeral ceremonies is so that all of these goals can be achieved.

Grief comes up when we have unfinished business with the dead person. That could be resentment, remorse, lost opportunities, guilt, injustice, regrets or a whole lot of other things. Or we were dependent on that person in some way and think we cannot cope on our own. If that is so then Headmind is unable to let go of the dead person and ceaselessly analyses the relationship that we once had. The unresolved wishes, the incomplete emotions, or the refusal to regain our independence, create the experience of grief.

Now, if we don't have any unfinished business we will feel sad but we won't need to grieve. This was illustrated for me by a story a client told me in Reverse Therapy last week.

She told me that when her Father some time before, it took her years to get over it. He had been a cold, bullying man who constantly belittled her. The state of mind she carried around with her was filled with things like rage, guilt, love, confusion, resentment and self-blame. She only emerged from her grief when she learned to forgive and move on.

But when her Mother died last year she experienced no grief at all. She cried - copiously - for a few days and then let it go. She and her Mother had been very close, very loving, and very honest with each other. She had already forgiven her Mother for the mistakes she had made as a parent. Besides, her Mother had been 93 and had been ill, and lonely, for a long time in an old people's home.

Her sister (who was badly effected by grief) and her aunt (also in the same position) told her that she must be 'heartless', 'sick', and 'abnormal' and should see a therapist! Fortunately, I was able to reassure her Headmind and she is now busy working on her new life.

That is all I have time for today. Tomorrow, I will add to this blog and write about how to be braver in speaking up about your emotions.

What emotions can do for you

On the right are some photos taken by Duchenne du Boulogne in the 1850s. Both the man and the woman have facial nerve damage which rendered them insensitive to the electrical probes attached to their heads. What the photos show is that it is possible to produce artificial smiles by stimulating certain facial muscles. Charles Darwin, in his book on Emotions, used this as evidence that human being are programmed by evolution to produce emotional signals automatically, through the nervous system.

Yet neither the man nor the woman are actually laughing, as is shown by the fact (if you look closely) that, in the man's case his eyes are not smiling, while in the woman's case only one side of the face is smiling.

You can't fake emotions. Nor can you will them. Emotions surprise us because we can't control them. And they are outside your conscious control for a very good reason.

The reason is that Bodymind (your emotional intelligence) uses emotions to signal that something unexpected has occurred and that there is something you need to do about it.

Joy, for example, tells you that things are going better than you hoped. Your body is telling you to carry on doing exactly the same as you were before (or even more of it) to get the same result. That's especially important feedback when you are having sex with someone!

Emotions are also predictions. They tell you what is likely to happen next if you do not take further action. For example, if your Body creates an anger signal it is telling you that you (and/or the people you care about) are going to be exploited some more if you don't assert your rights.

Here is a rough guide to what the other emotions are telling us, what they predict will happen next, and what Bodymind wants us to do about it.

• Fear. You are under threat. You may fail/get hurt/or be rejected by other people. You now need to take evasive action and take steps to regain control and confidence.
• Awe. You are in the presence of the divine. You are about to learn something important. You need to open up to new connections and powerful inspirations.
• Sadness. You have lost something or someone you loved. You will remain lonely unless you do something. You are now required to reconnect to other human beings.
• Disgust. You are being confronted with something repellent to your sense of what is proper. You could be harmed by dangerous people, animals or foodstuff. You need to distance yourself from the offender.
• Shame. You have let yourself or other people down. You are at risk of damaging some relationships that are important to to you. You now need to make amends to other people.

Note: all emotions are positive in the same way that happiness/pleasure/joy are. They are all there to push us towards either protecting ourselves, becoming more profound, more honest, more balanced, or more fulfilled. There is no such thing as a 'negative' emotion.

Notice, also, that worry, resentment, guilt and anxiety are not emotions. You can read something else I posted  about Guilt here. I will write up more about these other states of mind in a later post. I will also be writing more soon about what intuitions, gut feels and hunches tell us about the world we live in.

You can also read more about The Reverse Therapy of Emotions in my free Ebook - Reverse Therapy for Health.

Thanks to Rebecca and Karin-Ann for reading an earlier draft of this, and for your feedback!

 

How to make guilt work for you

Guilt, as most of us usually experience it, is not a good place to be. It tortures us, leaves us thinking we might be worthless, traps us in self-doubt, and paralyses our ability to act.

Over on Psyblog there is a recent good discussion of Guilt, putting up the idea that it pushes us to to make amends to other people. In that sense it acts as a Herd mechanism. So far, so good, but that doesn't tell us how to get rid of guilt.

It seems to me that there is still a lot of wrong thinking about guilt and that confusion gets in the way of our being able to do something about it.

The most important error people make is to label Guilt as an emotion. It is in fact a distortion of emotion. I have written about this before on Greed is Good - Yeah? The ego distorts emotion by getting obsessive about it instead of taking action and letting it go. When it produces guilt it mixes up emotion with unhelpful ideas like sin, self-blame and self-punishment.

The three major emotions that get distorted in guilt are fear, remorse and disgust. You could be experiencing, one, two, or all three of them at the same time.

Fear is there when there is a possibility that you may be found out. That your career, your relationships, your reputation or your friendships may be in jeopardy. Bodymind may be signalling you either to protect yourself or come clean.

Remorse is really a variation on the emotion of sadness (all the emotions work like this - consider them as having different keys, with sadness modulating into pity, love, empathy, compassion, grief, and remorse). Remorse is your body's way of telling you that it is time to make amends for your bad behavior. To be more attentive, loving, forgiving, generous or honest with the other party.

Disgust comes up when the action you took is repulsive in some way - potentially harmful to you or to other people. Your body needs you to make a decision and sever yourself from that situation for good.

Headmind distorts these emotions through worry, self-blame and by mixing up our identity with our behaviour. This also gets complicated by religion gone wrong - the myth of sin, divine judgment, and hellfire. This feeds the illusion of free-will: that we have complete control over our actions and can choose what to do. The reality is that we will always do what seems most desirable at the time given our current state of knowledge.

Here is a little process you can do to reverse out of guilt:

1. Identify the moment in time just before you did what you did. Relive that moment again in your visual and auditory imagination. Notice that you are just about to engage in the behavior you associate with guilt.

2. Now go into your body at that moment in time before you 'decided' to go ahead with the behavior.

3. Staying in your body in that moment notice that - given the situation, the knowledge you had at that time, and the state you were in, you could not in fact have done anything else. (If you had known any different, remember, you would not have done it).

4. Tell yourself: 'I make mistakes sometimes but I am not a bad person'

5. Fully realising your limitations in that moment, notice that you didn't actually have any guilt at that time.

6. Finally, decide what you want to do about your emotions - fear, remorse, or disgust. And take appropriate action.

Crying for Diana

The fact that it is the 10th anniversary of the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, coincides neatly with my reading and talking about Mark Earls’ blog on emotions last night, which you can read for yourself by clicking here.

If I understand him rightly, Mark is saying that grief, of the kind we saw in epidemic form in the week after Diana’s car crash, has a primarily social function. The tears we shed are released by what I call Bodymind in order to signal to us that we are in need of comforting and, indeed, crying is also in itself soothing. And the tears also signal to other human being around us that it is time for them to exercise empathy and compassion.

Now this is certainly borne out by neuroscience. The brain creates the emotion of sadness and signals the release of tears automatically once the limbic system detects that we (or people close to us) have received a shock - usually connected to losing someone close to us. Tears are involuntary and we have no conscious control over them. According to Anthony Damasio, once we become aware of an emotion it turns into a feeling and we straight away connect to the body’s ‘thoughts’ about the situation we are in. At the same time, the body is using an elaborate system of hormonal and neural signals which dictate what we (and the people around us) ought to do next. These, in turn, should trigger such social activities as empathy, compassion, sharing and the offer of constructive help.

OK - all well and good. But I felt nothing at all for the Peoples’ Princess. I recall grouching to my wife on the morning of the funeral about ’stupid royal soap operas’ watched by people who had nothing better to do with their lives before I went off to my completely empty gym club. Coming back, there was my wife glued to the TV. I stared at the thousands watching outside Westminster Abbey while Elton John tinkled through ‘Candle in the Wind’. And - yes - before long I was blubbing too. But WHY THE HELL WAS I CRYING?

According to Mark Earls I cried because everybody else was crying. And they were grieving because they had lost someone important to them, because they were experiencing compassion for Diana’s two sons, and because they were sharing in what was seen then as a national disaster. The huge amount of money that was raised for Diana’s Charitable Fund attests to the help that followed.

However, it seems to me that this explanation - as true as it is for most people - doesn’t explain why I and many of my fellow republicans were crying. At this point I offer a deeper (or, if you prefer) an additional, explanation. It seems to me that I was crying for the same reason that some people cry at the theatre, or the opera, or when they recall the sufferings of Christ. They go through what Aristotle called ‘catharsis’ -a release and cleansing, indeed a celebration of the tragedy each one of us carries through life. The death of the heroine reminds us of our own death, the death of those we love and the terrifying suddenness of it all. We weep for our fragility but we also celebrate our ability to withstand it - so long as other people are there to stand with us.

So tears can have a mythic point too. It is Bodymind’s way of registering our what it means to be human.